The rise of large digital platforms, accompanied by claims of increasing industrial concentration, has prompted calls for antitrust policy reform. Yet, the observed market trends are consistent with improvements in welfare, as economies of scale often decentralize effective choices and disintermediate previously dominant structures, unleashing entrepreneurship.
This article examines the Delaware courts’ 1980s shift from managerialism to a theory I label proceduralism. I argue that managerialism, which justified corporate law’s deference to directors in the preceding fifty years, was corporate law’s response to social, political, and cultural concerns outside corporations.
Antitrust law faces a fundamental paradox between protecting competition and protecting competitors. This paradox is more structurally durable in China than in Western societies thanks to the oversized role of the Chinese state in its economy. This Article examines the changing market conditions in China following the adoption of China’s Antimonopoly Law (AML), and how these changes have led to paradoxical developments in Chinese antitrust.
The federal government frequently executes searches and seizures in the course of criminal investigations. Many of the premises searched contain materials protected by privileges, placing them outside the reach of the Department of Justice. However, again and again those materials are swept up, potentially landing in the hands of government attorneys who are not permitted to review them—placing defendants’ Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel at risk of being violated.
The FTC Act allows the FTC to recover monetary relief only in certain circumstances. Under Sections 5 and 19, the Commission can recover monetary relief in federal court by showing that a party violated a final cease and desist order issued through administrative processes. Until recently, the FTC extensively used Section 13 of the Act, which courts had interpreted to provide some pathways to monetary relief.
Wholesalers in U.S. equity markets are once again a focus of the SEC and scholarly debate. In this Comment, building on the empirical work of Schwarz, et. al. (2022), I present a model of the broker-wholesaler relationship based on the duty of best execution under FINRA Rule 5310 and the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws as well as public disclosures by brokers and wholesalers.
Antitrust has traditionally served consumers—how can the law regulate firms in a manner that prevents monopolization and preserves competition among sellers of goods? A recent turn in scholarship and shifting application of antitrust law from a regulatory perspective suggests the possibility for a broader expansion of antitrust protections into the labor market.
