Volume 3.2
Summer
2024

Print
Comment
Volume 3.2
Free Markets and Free Speech: Understanding the Limits of the Noerr-Pennington Doctrine
Mitsoo K. Patel
B.S. 2019, University of Maryland, College Park; J.D. Candidate 2025, University of Chicago Law School.

Many thanks to the University of Chicago Business Law Review staff for their helpful edits and feedback. I would like to especially thank Professor Eric Posner for his thoughtful suggestions and guidance.

Based in First Amendment principles, the Noerr-Pennington doctrine immunizes parties petitioning the government from antitrust liability, even when such petitioning may be considered anticompetitive. Within the doctrine exists a narrower “sham exception” which eliminates Noerr-Pennington antitrust immunity when petitions are merely shams meant to interfere with a competitor’s business.